professional looking. quot;tions from others outweigh the writers own ideas excessively. The evidence used reflects multiple views. Paper presents well-developed analysis and synthesis. Missing titles, captions, headings, name of author. Language and style poor. All web sites utilized are authoritative.
Biographical criticism research paper rubric
Main points are memorable. Literature has more meaning and depth when we understand circumstances which prompted the writer to write. Acceptable, visual Presentation, cover page with relevant info, including descriptive title. A thesis statement provides direction for the paper, either by statement of a position or hypothesis. Biographical information should only deepen the message that is already in the text. A reader simply does not connect himself as strongly with a written piece if he does not know the background and circumstances in which it was written. Paper is not organized. Citation style is either inconsistent or incorrect. Some of the conclusions, however, are not supported in the body of the paper. "Learning, for example, that the poet Josephine Miles was confined to a wheelchair or that Weldon Kees committed suicide at forty-one will certainly make us pay attention to certain aspects of their poems we might otherwise have missed or considered unimportant (Kennedy 2174).". Arguments are pertinent to the topic.
Research papers conscription, How to begin a physics research paper,